page  from encyclopedia on the “twelve sciences”

Caption: A book page taken from the sixteenth-century encyclopedia on “twelve sciences”, written by Nev'î Efendi.

Source: open access, Open Collections Program at Harvard University, Houghton Library, Harvard University (https://curiosity.lib.harvard.edu/islamic-heritage-project/catalog/40-990114152050203941)

 

Working Group (2020-2027)

Agriculture and the Making of Sciences (1100–1700)

“The science of farming is a science full of benefits; it is the origin of all industries.” ʿ ilm-i filāḥat ʿ ilm-i pür menāfiʿ ve aṣl-ı cemi-i ṣanāyıʿ, Nevi Efendi (1533/4–1598)

If philosophy and mathematics constituted the major achievements of early modern scientific thought, agricultural practices grounded premodern scholars in their approaches to such topics: Shen Gua 沈括 (1031–1095) based his discussions of constants (chang 常) and variables (bian 變) in the principles of things (wuli 物理) on his observations of farming rhythms; Al-Ghazali (1058–1111) discussed man’s rational faculty and geometry after observing the hexagonal shape of bee hives. This project scrutinizes how “working the soil” informed change in scientific, technological, and medical knowledge and practice from the shores of Bahr al-muhit al-gharbi (the Atlantic) to Donghai (East China Sea) during the twelfth to seventeenth centuries. We invite scholars to examine at practices such as grafting, manuring, hydraulic engineering, or seed production, to determine how knowledge about the natural world was defined and systematized. For example, what was deemed useful for medical purposes; what constituted a food, and what was utilized in mechanic structures?  By examining concrete practices of agriculture, we look from the “ground up” at the formation of different fields of knowledge and knowledge cultures in which these practices found expression, and from there the production of farming knowledge. Our comparison has two reference points: the Sinographic world, incorporating Classical Chinese (as used in China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam), and the Arabic, Persian, and Ottoman Turkish literary traditions.

The working group is collaborating with Brill to launch a book series: "Agriculture and the Making of Sciences 1100–1700: Texts, Practices, and Transcultural Transmission of Knowledge in Asia."

We address these questions:

  1. What bodies of knowledge were abstracted from people's experiences in the complex realities of agricultural practice, and how?
  2. How were such bodies of knowledge categorized into different epistemic fields, and negotiated between discrete epistemic subjects?
  3. How were some bodies of knowledge generalized, universalized, until they became “the orthodoxy” that created social and material realities, while others were only discussed within a narrow field (for instance, farming manuals maintained a stabilized body of agricultural knowledge, did what was excluded go into other fields and became organized in other forms)?
  4. How were new epistemic fields formed when various bodies of knowledge were negotiated and reconnected to reproduce heterodox alternatives?
  5. In times of increasing global interconnections, how did authors make sense of “new things” (for example, American plants, etc.), incorporating them into established bodies and forms of knowledge? What were the mechanisms of keeping the established forms of knowledge as the orthodoxy?
  6. How did genres such as farming manuals evolve and their contents change over time?

In addition to farming manuals and treatises, we examine diverse forms of agricultural knowledge that did not conveniently fit into the discrete scholarly categories of their respective times: legal writings, cosmographies, dictionaries, materia medica, manuals of mechanical art, as well as artifacts and visual representations.  

A chain-pump depicted in Wang Zhen’s Nongshu

A chain-pump depicted in Wang Zhen’s Nongshu (“The Book on Agriculture”), first published in Yuan-period China. Source: open access, the Naikaku Bunko Collection, National Archives of Japan Digital Archive (https://www.digital.archives.go.jp/das/image/F1000000000000099582)

 

News & Press

Academic publisher Brill releases new open-access series Agriculture and the Making of Sciences

More

Call for Papers: Conference on Scientific, Practical, and Material Culture of Soil in the Premodern World

More

Past Events

A Green-Colored Leaf Called Tabaġa: Early Ottoman Inquiries into an American Plant

MORE

Reinventing Disaster in Yuan China

MORE

Agriculture and the Making of Sciences

MORE

Agriculture and the Making of Sciences

MORE

Digitizing Land: Methods and Visualizing a Fifteenth-Century Egyptian Cadastral Survey

MORE

Soil and Farming Implements in Medieval and Early Modern Egypt

MORE

Mapping Soil Types in a Fifteenth-Century Egyptian Cadastral Survey

MORE

Famine Foods in the Early Modern Sinosphere

MORE

Agriculture and the Making of Sciences, 1100-1700

MORE

Agriculture and the Making of Sciences, 1100-1700

MORE

Agriculture and the Making of Sciences, 1100-1700

MORE

Soil Fertilisation in Mamluk and Ming Agricultural Manuals

MORE

European Discourses on the Effects of Indian Foods during the 15th to 18th Centuries: From the Fruits of Paradise to the Racialization of Nutrition

MORE

Towards a Global History of Soil: Sciences, Practices, Materialities and Mobilities, 1100-1700

MORE

Botanical Knowledge of Food Plants in Middle and Late Imperial China

MORE

Soils, Stars, and Statecraft: Cosmological Conceptions of Agriculture in China and Europe, ca. 1600-1789

MORE

Water’s Benefits: Scholarly Knowledge and Statecraft Science

MORE

Moonrise, Moonset, and Planting Times

MORE

The Agrarian Structure of the Sultanate of Mysore (1761-1799)

MORE

Putting Knowledge to Practice: "Reading" Agricultural Terraces in Medieval Palestine

MORE

Astrometeorology and Global Climate Theory: Interpreting John Goad's Weather Notebooks, 1652-1682

MORE

Projects