This project compares the codified cost estimates for Buddhist art objects such as statues and painting from three different dynasties: the Mongol Yuan, the Han-Chinese Ming, and the Manchu Qing. Particular focus is on the difference between the estimates and the actual costs and operability of the projects as such. The main sources are the official Yuan dynasty survey of statuary and painting projects Yuandai huasu ji, official cost estimates and final reports of Ming officials on statues and paintings, and archival material of the Qing Imperial household department that relates to budgeting, planning, and final reporting of Buddhist objects and paraphernalia. The project looks into the evaluation of misbudgeted religious planning. It asks whether there were additional issues at stake when the object served a religious purpose and whether there is evidence of different budgeting cultures in Yuan, Ming, and Qing China.