In this research project, Mona Friedrich studied the rise of organized record-keeping from roughly 1450 to 1789. It was only during this period that archives gained prominence in Western Civilization. In fact, archives became so fundamental a part of our lives that we often consider their existence "normal." As this project demonstrated, however, the existence of archives is not at all "natural." Developing archives and making them part of European culture was, in fact, complicated.
The project was based on several foundational methodological assumptions: First, the rise and existence of archives must thoroughly be historicized. Second, archives have to be understood as enormous challenges to Europe’s conceptual and social fabric. Third, the impact of archives on European culture must be studied on a practical level. Only if we study how, by whom, and in what contexts archives could be and were actually used can we understand their relevance. Fourth, archives were potentially dysfunctional or even counter-productive institutions. All too often, historical assessments simply assume that archives per se increased effectivity. Archives became part of the European myth of rationalizing progress. Yet this is only rarely justified. Highlighting the contradictions, shortcomings, and weaknesses of archives were therefore a crucial aspect of this project.
To implement this broad research agenda, this project took case studies on different regions and different archival contexts—law, historiography, politics. The handwritten and printed sources available in Berlin allowed a focus on the record-keeping practices of the Holy Roman Empire and the historiographical usage of archives before the advent of historicism.