Reflections: Historiographical and Epistemological - Session VII

► Chair: Paul Hoyningen-Huene (University of Hanover)

Get the Flash Player to see this player.
File: stream42.flv
Date: Di, 25 Nov 2008 17:51:52 +0100
Dimensions: 320, 240

► Mary Tiles (University of Hawaii, Manoa): Is Historical Epistemology Part of the „Modernist Settlement“?

Get the Flash Player to see this player.
File: stream43.flv
Date: Di, 25 Nov 2008 17:52:03 +0100
Dimensions: 320, 240

Bruno Latour, as part of his advocacy of science studies urges us to move beyond what he calls “the modernist settlement” that, among other things, separated science from politics and subject from object.  As part of this project he has frequently called for the abolition of epistemology, including quite specifically the historical epistemology/epistemological history of Bachelard and Canguilhem.
Pierre Bourdieu, on the other hand, deploys the resources of historical epistemology, to dismiss Latour’s science studies. At issue here are two competing sociological accounts of contemporary scientific knowledge and the conditions of its production.  They agree in their concern over the deleterious effects of the current socio-political positioning of science but differ sharply in their analyses.  A comparison of their positions may at least serve to help us understand why historical epistemology is assessed both as an obstacle and an asset by different protagonists in the politics of nature.

Q & A to Mary Tiles' talk

Get the Flash Player to see this player.
File: stream44.flv
Date: Di, 25 Nov 2008 17:52:13 +0100
Dimensions: 320, 240

► Martin Kusch (University of Cambridge): Reflexivity, Relativism, Microhistory: Desiderata for Historical Epistemologies

Get the Flash Player to see this player.
File: stream45.flv
Date: Di, 25 Nov 2008 17:52:22 +0100
Dimensions: 320, 240

The label "historical epistemology" has been used to characterise a wide variety of different historical and philosophical projects. One common denominator of several of these projects is that they count Ian Hacking's theory of "styles of (scientific) reasoning" as a key influence or model. This paper will be a critical discussion of Hacking's theory. I shall relate some of my observations to a recent key text in historical epistemology: Lorraine Daston's and Peter Galison's *Objectivity*.

Q & A to Martin Kusch's talk

Get the Flash Player to see this player.
File: stream46.flv
Date: Di, 25 Nov 2008 17:52:34 +0100
Dimensions: 320, 240

► Barry Stroud (University of California, Berkeley): The Value of a Historically Oriented Epistemology

Get the Flash Player to see this player.
File: stream47.flv
Date: Di, 25 Nov 2008 17:52:43 +0100
Dimensions: 320, 240

A brief discussion of the ways in which awareness of and sensitivity to the history of philosophy can contribute to epistemology even if epistemology is understood as a distinctively philosophical and not primarily historical enterprise.


Commentator: Catherine Wilson (City University of New York)

Get the Flash Player to see this player.
File: stream48.flv
Date: Di, 25 Nov 2008 17:52:56 +0100
Dimensions: 320, 240

► Q & A to Catherine Wilson's commentary

 

Get the Flash Player to see this player.
File: stream49.flv
Date: Di, 25 Nov 2008 17:53:04 +0100
Dimensions: 320, 240

► General discussion

Get the Flash Player to see this player.
File: stream50.flv
Date: Di, 25 Nov 2008 17:53:15 +0100
Dimensions: 320, 240